1

Hello,

I understand that the six realms can be interpreted as states of the mind. But at the same time I believe in Yidam yoga, not only as symbolic but as a real emanation too - I have devotion.

If the six realms are only symbolic then Buddhas / Siddhas cannot surpass the three times and cannot preform any miracles also; as I think they are both superstitions, so may be rebirth.

At the same time nirvana may not be reachable by mantras as only a 8th level Bodhisattva can compose a mantra; and a lower level Bodhisattva in the 1st step is able see 100 lives before and after.

I do believe in miracles, karma, nirvana, rebirth and "spirits" because of my experiences in life. I might be wrong, but shouldn't this make sense ? I mean Buddhism is very logical...

What is considered a superstition from a Buddhist point of view ?

Thank you !

6 Answers 6

1

Superstition runs deep. Everytime you say body is me , mine or myself, you are being superstitious. Everytime you say feeling is me , mine or myself , you are being superstitious. Everytime you say perceptions are me , mine or myself, you are being superstitious. Everytime you say choices are me , mine or myself , you are being superstitious. Everytime you say consciousness is me , mine or myself , you are being superstitious.

1

Buddhist practice is to strip away illusions. To ask whether some belief is real or superstition is counterproductive; we should only look to see if it can be stripped away without harm.

Imagine that every belief we have is a thin veil over your eyes. These veils protect us from seeing too much before we are ready to understand. They filter, soften, and structure the world, glossing over details and highlighting important points. When we realize we are wearing a veil we can draw it away, and the world will look the same, but different. If we can pull away all the veils, we'll see the same world, transformed. We will not know whether something we believe is or is not superstition until we pull away the relevant veils and see it clearly.

Don't look for truth; look for the veils over your eyes. Truth isn't going anywhere.

1

The ego can very easily be considered a superstition. Buddha’s teachings show us that the “self”, just like everything else, isn’t permanent.

If there are some beliefs you think are just supernatural, you need to remember that you’re not yet completely free from delusion. I’m not either, but I’ve heard that the best way to handle such beliefs is to figure out whether the Buddha’s teachings would still work and make sense.

Quote from Thaganapa, one of the 84 Mahasiddhas:

Inject water into the ear To release water in the ear; Contemplate phenomena as a lie And you see the truth.

1

Reality is our interpretation. What we think is reality is a reflection of our mind and energy.

So yes, the six realms are states of mind, but it is still true that depending on your state of mind you can find yourself in an entirely different world. It's just not as simple as six worlds, it's more than six. The six is just a simple picture, to make a point.

Miracles, karma, nirvana, rebirth, spirits and yidams are all real, just not how they show them in the movies. Once you learn to "see" you can "see" them with your mind.

It's only a superstition if you think they exist like the grandma in the village, in a primitive way.

0

My impression from studying Buddhist scriptures is doctrines of reincarnation developed more & more with the advancement of Buddhist history. In the early Pali scriptures, there appears actually no word that literally means 'rebirth' or 'past lives'. For example, there appears only one sutta that explains the meaning of the term 'pubba-nivasa', which literally means 'past-dwellings' but is often translated as 'past-lives'. This one sutta is SN 22.79, which appears to explain a 'past-dwelling' is every time in the past the mind ignorantly clung to one or more of the five aggregates as 'self'. In addition, there are many suttas that appear to use the six realms as here & now mental states, such as SN 35.135.

In summary, the question of this topic sounds based in later day Tibetan Buddhism, which, similar to later day Theravada, has very structured literal doctrines of reincarnation. However, from the earlier Pali suttas, it appears a case can be made for different (here & now) interpretations of what are called 'the six realms' and 'past lives'.

As for supernormal psychic powers, the early Pali sutta report the Buddha & some (but not all) of his enlightened disciples can these. Supernormal psychic powers have no relationship to the six realms or notions of past & future lives. In the early Pali suttas, it is reported the Buddha used supernormal psychic powers to observe the (moral) rise & fall of beings according to their kamma. The Buddha did not use supernormal psychic powers to observe past-dwellings (or what is commonly translated as past-lives). This can be read in the stock phrases describing the Three Knowledges, as found at the end of MN 4 and DN 2.

"With his mind thus concentrated, purified, and bright, unblemished, free from defects, pliant, malleable, steady, and attained to imperturbability, he directs and inclines it to knowledge of the recollection of past lives (lit: previous homes). He recollects his manifold past lives, i.e., one birth, two births, three births, four, five, ten, twenty, thirty, forty, fifty, one hundred, one thousand, one hundred thousand, many aeons of cosmic contraction, many aeons of cosmic expansion, many aeons of cosmic contraction and expansion, [recollecting], 'There I had such a name, belonged to such a clan, had such an appearance. Such was my food, such my experience of pleasure and pain, such the end of my life. Passing away from that state, I re-arose there. There too I had such a name, belonged to such a clan, had such an appearance. Such was my food, such my experience of pleasure and pain, such the end of my life. Passing away from that state, I re-arose here.' Thus he recollects his manifold past lives in their modes and details. Just as if a man were to go from his home village to another village, and then from that village to yet another village, and then from that village back to his home village. The thought would occur to him, 'I went from my home village to that village over there. There I stood in such a way, sat in such a way, talked in such a way, and remained silent in such a way. From that village I went to that village over there, and there I stood in such a way, sat in such a way, talked in such a way, and remained silent in such a way. From that village I came back home.' In the same way — with his mind thus concentrated, purified, and bright, unblemished, free from defects, pliant, malleable, steady, and attained to imperturbability — the monk directs and inclines it to knowledge of the recollection of past lives. He recollects his manifold past lives... in their modes and details.

"This, too, great king, is a fruit of the contemplative life, visible here and now, more excellent than the previous ones and more sublime.

With his mind thus concentrated, purified, and bright, unblemished, free from defects, pliant, malleable, steady, and attained to imperturbability, he directs and inclines it to knowledge of the passing away and re-appearance of beings. He seesby means of the divine eye [supernormal psychic power], purified and surpassing the human — beings passing away and re-appearing, and he discerns how they are inferior and superior, beautiful and ugly, fortunate and unfortunate in accordance with their kamma: 'These beings — who were endowed with bad conduct of body, speech, and mind, who reviled the noble ones, held wrong views and undertook actions under the influence of wrong views — with the break-up of the body, after death, have re-appeared in the plane of deprivation, the bad destination, the lower realms, in hell. But these beings — who were endowed with good conduct of body, speech, and mind, who did not revile the noble ones, who held right views and undertook actions under the influence of right views — with the break-up of the body, after death, have re-appeared in the good destinations, in the heavenly world.' Thus — by means of the divine eye, purified and surpassing the human — he sees beings passing away and re-appearing, and he discerns how they are inferior and superior, beautiful and ugly, fortunate and unfortunate in accordance with their kamma. Just as if there were a tall building in the central square [of a town], and a man with good eyesight standing on top of it were to see people entering a house, leaving it, walking along the street, and sitting in the central square. The thought would occur to him, 'These people are entering a house, leaving it, walking along the streets, and sitting in the central square.' In the same way — with his mind thus concentrated, purified, and bright, unblemished, free from defects, pliant, malleable, steady, and attained to imperturbability — the monk directs and inclines it to knowledge of the passing away and re-appearance of beings. He sees — by means of the divine eye, purified and surpassing the human — beings passing away and re-appearing, and he discerns how they are inferior and superior, beautiful and ugly, fortunate and unfortunate in accordance with their kamma...

To conclude this question, which is about 'superstition', in the early Pali suttas, there is only one Dhamma Refuge, which is defined as follows:

‘Bhikkhus, this Dhamma is visible here and now, immediately effective, inviting inspection, onward leading, to be experienced by the wise for themselves.’

MN 38

0

The Buddhist concept of miracles is different from our stereotypical conception of miracles, i.e. some eponymous bit of God does something "impossible". It is not being miraculous in a literal sense but appears to defy laws that are natural to this world i.e. they defy what we see to be possible even with enough time and our knowledge of the world and us. Siddha lists are one way of showing or knowing of such anomalies. Specifically for Buddhists, the main work explaining it using siddhis which is as you know, the literal translation of "miracle". The Pāli canon gives such a lot of detail regarding the more apparent miracles and lacks details about every other miracle.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .