I've been searching around forums for the maximum time that is productive to do a single meditation sit. There are lots of comments around over 20 minute mark for effectiveness and sitting for the hour is the most I've seen anyone say they sit. But what is the maximum that one should reasonably sit for before it becomes counter productive or at least diminishing returns set in?

As a side note I remember Jack Kornfield relating that a retreatant of his declared that he was going to sit for as long as it took to get enlightened. He didn't get enlightened and the whole episode didn't go that well for that individual


At the Zen Temple, we used to sit for two hours, in three 35-minute periods with 5 minute "walking meditation" breaks in between. In my experience, the first hour is not "it" yet, it is only by the third period when it gets seriously deep.

During the sesshin (retreat) we would meditate for longer stretches of time, probably about 5 hours, in roughly the same manner with 5 minute breaks for walking meditation.

In Tibetan Buddhism it is customary for advanced students to go on a Two Year Retreat during which they basically do nothing but meditate. Not saying you have to do it or that I would do it - but if they do it, they probably consider it useful, I think?

All this is to say, I don't think there is a "maximum" time - the more the better, subject to practical considerations and your own personal limits.

That said, in the temple we meditated twice a week, not daily. With daily meditation, I noticed I need less time to get going, also, for many people two hours every day may not be very practical. So when you do it daily at home, 1 hour is enough, fine, very good. If you can do it daily for an hour, you don't need to worry about doing more.

P.S. Of course, if someone is obsessed with meditation, has craving for the meditation highs, or is treating meditation as a kind of competitive body-building, that's a case of Spiritual Materialism and should be treated accordingly - but I don't think that's what your question is about, is it.

  • I've down-voted because your meditation seems to have some sort of goal in mind. – user10515 Feb 13 at 17:07
  • To say either "yes" or "no" would be a lie ;-) – Andrei Volkov Feb 13 at 17:16
  • @GavinSerra - I wonder when the Buddha gave up his goal for enlightenment when he sat under the Bodhi tree. ;-) – user14849 Feb 13 at 18:33

I find daily sits of an unbroken hour and a half to be optimum. The first half hour is normally just enough to settle my mind and loosen the hold that the day has on me. The next half hour is spent really honing in on my concentration object (i.e. cultivating sustained thought). It's here that my mind begins to unify into something resembling one-pointedness. The next half hour is where the magic happens, so to speak. During that part of the sit - and really depending on the day - is when my body starts to drop away and rapture begins to arise.

Some days I may push toward two to three hours, but unless you are in a retreat situation, those longer sits don't necessarily get much deeper. Your karmic obstacles simply have too much of a hold on your mind. Only extended periods of silence and multiple 8+ hour days of meditation will allow you to progress into jhana.

Side note: my teacher's teacher knew a monk who would just randomly sit for two days. 48 hours. No sleep, no food, no bathroom. In full lotus. I can't even imagine doing that!


At home I think sitting for 20 - 40 mins once or twice a day is ideal. If you want to sit for longer, then the best thing to do is to go on an organised retreat somewhere.

I would also suggest having a look at this series of articles by Shohaku Okumura (a dharma grandson of Kodo Sawaki), who says:

...zazen itself can be a poison and cause sickness. If our motivation to practise is influenced by the three poisons, that is, if we practise for the sake of making this person more important, more powerful, more enlightened or for anything else, then it is motivated by greed, ‘I want to get this or that.’ It may not be for wealth or power that we practise, but for something spiritual. If we practise in order to get something desirable, however, our zazen is generated by greed.



Sitting for an hour is the maximum productive time for a meditation sit. Sitting in a meditation position for longer than an hour can be unhealthy for the physical body and it can reduce the effectiveness of the meditation. I think in some traditions people are sitting for long periods of time but it requires special training. I think that in formal meditation walking must be done as much as sitting. So it is better to do walking meditation before and after the sitting meditation. Then when you return back to the sitting meditation, you'll be refreshed and you'll be able to meditate effectively.

The chances of enlightenment increases when the mindfulness becomes continous in daily life. So doing intensive meditation for many hours and keeping the mindfulness all day long is the gateway to liberation.


well the legend says that the citta sits in samadhi for 7 days max, so strive for that.

for sati sampajanna, ie mindfulness, there is no need to sit. You do it when you eat, when you walk , when you clean the house, and it is the continuous activity: each hour of each day of each week you track thoughts and sanna and vedana, in order to swap bad thoughts, which are that

And what, bhikkhus, is the unwholesome? Destroying life, taking what is not given, misconduct in sensual pleasures, lying, malicious speech, frivolous talks, covetousness, ill-will and wrong view: this is called, bhikkhus, the unwholesome.

And what, bhikkhus, is the wholesome? Abstaing from destroying life, abstaining from taking what is not given, abstaining from misconduct in sensual pleasures, abstaining from lying, abstaining from malicious speech, abstaining from frivolous talks, non-covetousness, non-ill-will and right view: this is called, bhikkhus, the wholesome.

The fruits of mindfulness are that:

Bhikkhus, heedfulness should be practiced in four instances. Which four? Abandon bodily misconduct and develop bodily good conduct; do not be negligent towards it. Abandon verbal misconduct and develop verbal good conduct; do not be negligent towards it. Abandon mental misconduct and develop mental good conduct; do not be negligent towards it. Abandon wrong view and develop right view; do not be negligent towards it.

Bhikkhus, heedfulness, mindfulness and protection of the mind should be practiced by oneself in four instances. Which four? Heedfulness, mindfulness and protection of the mind should be practiced by oneself [thinking:] 'May my mind not become avid on account of things that induce avidity.' Heedfulness, mindfulness and protection of the mind should be practiced by oneself [thinking:] ' May my mind not become averse to things that induce aversion.' Heedfulness, mindfulness and protection of the mind should be practiced by oneself [thinking:] 'May my mind not become deluded on account of things that induce delusion.' Heedfulness, mindfulness and protection of the mind should be practiced by oneself [thinking:] 'May my mind not become intoxicated by things that intoxicate.'

When you get good at mindulfness, the citta will sit in samadhi and the sañña and vedana will become good, meritorious, and when you have those jhanas, you do vipassana like that

Venerable sir, is there a single quality declared by the Blessed One—the one who knows, the one who sees, worthy & rightly self-awakened—where the unreleased mind of a monk who dwells there heedful, ardent, & resolute becomes released, or his unended fermentations go to their total ending, or he attains the unexcelled security from the yoke that he had not attained before?”

“Yes, householder, there is…”

“And what is that one quality, venerable sir…?”

“There is the case, householder, where a monk, withdrawn from sensuality, withdrawn from unskillful qualities, enters & remains in the first jhana: rapture & pleasure born from withdrawal, accompanied by directed thought & evaluation. He reflects on this and discerns, ‘This first jhana is fabricated & intended. Now whatever is fabricated & intended is inconstant & subject to cessation.’ Staying right there, he reaches the ending of the mental fermentations. Or, if not, then—through this very Dhamma-passion, this Dhamma-delight, and from the total wasting away of the first five Fetters—he is due to be reborn [in the Pure Abodes], there to be totally unbound, never again to return from that world. https://suttacentral.net/an11.16/en/thanissaro

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.