Timeline for Is this nibbana or god?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2 at 2:11 | history | edited | Dhamma Dhatu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
[Edit removed during grace period]
|
| May 2 at 2:10 | comment | added | Dhamma Dhatu | Hello. This view of Maimonides (born 1138 CE) appears in contradiction to the Hebrew Bible. Maimonides lived in the Islamic world and possibly his view of god was an attempt at alignment with the Islamic conception of Allah. | |
| May 27, 2020 at 18:54 | comment | added | XPD | No. God you're talking about is a personification of nature. Also logics or Boolean logic or set theory doesn't have anything to do here. Misleading answer. | |
| May 27, 2020 at 6:03 | comment | added | Ilya Grushevskiy | Just really the last paragraph. Actually, I would say not '0', but '[ ]' - an empty set for nibbana, if being pedantic. Atman however, is an attempt to build a '1' into things. That thing, existing independent of individual experience. nibbana does not exist, it does not not exist, it is not conditioned, by any thing. | |
| May 26, 2020 at 8:28 | comment | added | user646989 | What do you mean by ultimate reality ? The atma in Hinduism is unborn too | |
| May 25, 2020 at 16:05 | history | answered | Ilya Grushevskiy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |