Timeline for Can someone provide explanation on dependent origination
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2021 at 17:28 | comment | added | ruben2020♦ | "Dependent origination is like man is afraid of the shadow of his own light." - this sounds like you're mocking the teaching on dependent origination. | |
| Oct 25, 2021 at 17:27 | comment | added | ruben2020♦ | The Buddha taught that even if there was no one to perceive it, the three marks of existence (dukkha, anicca, anatta) are true and would persist, because these are universal laws. Please see AN 3.136. And Nibbana as the uncreated and unborn doesn't refer to a person or soul or Supreme Soul. Nibbana is that which is experienced by the mind when it is completely free of defilements. It is peace and bliss. All consciousness is dependently arisen and impermanent in Buddhism. There's no Eternal Witness. | |
| Oct 24, 2021 at 18:28 | comment | added | sandeep telang | In the Vinaya, Buddha said the Buddha's teachings would last for 500 years. Many Buddhists claim this did not come true therefore the Vinaya teaching is false. That means Buddha saying was not true and nowadays monks telling the truth. No. Buddha was right, what Buddhism is so famous nowadays for which Buddha actually have never ever preached! | |
| Oct 24, 2021 at 18:02 | comment | added | sandeep telang | The phrase "sabbe dhamma anatta" includes within its scope each skandha (aggregate, heap) that compose any being. So, here they are talking of what is not ours. What remains after one finds each aggregate as impermanent? Who perceive that all aggregates are impermanent? Think over it. Dhammapada says: Discard the sense desire oh fool and realise the uncreated, unborn! If uncreated and unborn wouldn't exist then there is no freedom for born and created. There is no freedom from death and birth. Uncreated and unborn? Do you get really what it means? | |
| Oct 24, 2021 at 8:45 | comment | added | ruben2020♦ | Could you quote the Buddhist scriptures or expert commentaries to support "thing which exists before becoming I.e. the soul", "The real thing is that you are that Supreme Soul" and "Sammasambodhi doesn't mean that he knows everything, but living the life of union with the Master I.e the soul"? These phrases don't seem Buddhist and seem to conflict with sabbe dhamma anatta - all phenomena is not self. | |
| Oct 23, 2021 at 18:06 | review | Late answers | |||
| Oct 30, 2021 at 17:47 | |||||
| Oct 23, 2021 at 18:00 | history | edited | sandeep telang | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 203 characters in body
|
| Oct 23, 2021 at 17:51 | history | edited | sandeep telang | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 452 characters in body
|
| S Oct 23, 2021 at 17:43 | review | First answers | |||
| Nov 6, 2021 at 17:47 | |||||
| S Oct 23, 2021 at 17:43 | history | answered | sandeep telang | CC BY-SA 4.0 |