Timeline for Why did the buddha teach the mahayana?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2017 at 13:56 | comment | added | Lowbrow | @Bhumishu Enlightenment is very possible. You have no faith for the great vow? | |
| Dec 29, 2016 at 4:04 | comment | added | Mishu 米殊 | "The Buddha is correct, as the Diamond sutra would say: There is no perfection, that is why it's called perfection." (terrible english translation). So Honourable Yinxu, you think your speech = the Diamond Sutra, therefore you can write "A 'Buddha' implies 'perfection' even as there is no real perfection"??! You can't even read the Diamond Sutra. It's horrible for someone to go around saying you 'make' "bad karma"... worst some even said 'you will go to Narakas' when they are disagreed... OK. This is my last comment on yours. I choose to avoid entanglement. Thank you for your response. | |
| Dec 26, 2016 at 19:26 | comment | added | Yinxu | You don't understand my post either. Honestly your sentence isn't well structured so it's hard to tell that you were being sarcastic. And sarcasm isn't Right Speech. The Buddha is correct, as the Diamond sutra would say: There is no perfection, that is why it's called perfection. | |
| Dec 26, 2016 at 12:47 | comment | added | Mishu 米殊 | Hello honourable Yinxu, you think that you are correct?! Therefore, the buddha must be wrong?!! You can't even read the meaning of my comment. | |
| Dec 26, 2016 at 2:06 | comment | added | Yinxu | Don't go around saying Buddha is lying to us. It's bad karma and you are only increasing your own delusion. | |
| Dec 25, 2016 at 13:40 | comment | added | Mishu 米殊 | [b]"As pointed out, no person can ever be 'perfectly' enlightened either. The Mahayana Buddhists know their goal is not truly possible just as even the goals of the Theravada - extinction of rebirth is not truly possible."[/b] If your above sentence is correct, then Buddha must be lying to us... again, same here [b]"A 'Buddha' implies 'perfection' even as there is no real perfection"[/b] | |
| Dec 25, 2016 at 4:41 | history | edited | Yinxu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Add comments regarding terminologies
|
| Dec 25, 2016 at 3:23 | history | edited | Yinxu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Add the context about Nagarjuna
|
| Dec 25, 2016 at 3:17 | history | answered | Yinxu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |