Timeline for Should detachment, and letting go, be an appropriate response when you are owed money?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 24, 2015 at 10:05 | vote | accept | Suibhne | ||
Oct 23, 2015 at 22:25 | comment | added | Andriy Volkov♦ | @Suibhne: see buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/12025/43 | |
Oct 23, 2015 at 16:16 | answer | added | user2424 | timeline score: 4 | |
Oct 23, 2015 at 16:14 | answer | added | Sankha Kulathantille | timeline score: 4 | |
Oct 23, 2015 at 14:24 | comment | added | Suibhne | Thanks @UrsulRosu. That makes sense, and helps. Accept the anger for what it is, watch it (hopefully) pass, and have no expectation one way or the other for the outcome. All the while continuing to pursue them in a reasonable, and non-agressive, yet persistent, manner. | |
Oct 23, 2015 at 11:15 | comment | added | user4878 | I think that you should let go in the way that you don't take the matter personally, see the anger that is conditioned by factors and conditions as not being yourself, and so don't resist that anger but let it cease, let it go home by itself. "Ah, this anger has arisen because this happened, it is conditioned, it is not me, it is not mine, it is not myself. :)" Then go after the money smiling if you get it, smiling if you don't get it. | |
Oct 23, 2015 at 10:01 | review | First posts | |||
Oct 23, 2015 at 11:56 | |||||
Oct 23, 2015 at 9:57 | history | asked | Suibhne | CC BY-SA 3.0 |