I noticed some buddhist monks spend a lot of their time teaching and giving dhamma talks, while other monks spend minimal time on these things.

I was wondering if there are any rules in the monastic code for monks regarding how much time a monk should spent on teaching?

  • 1
    Merely becoming a monk does not make one qualified to teach, just like joining medical school does not make one a surgeon. Some can have valid reasons for not teaching, others can just be lazy or needing encouragement. It is up to their teacher or abbot to enforce. I am not going to actually mark this an answer, since I am not a monk. – Buddho Jun 25 '15 at 7:31
  • 1
    Hello @Sri Lanka. Venerable Yuttadhammo gave an interesting dhamma talk tonight regarding teaching. I thought you might like it. meditation.sirimangalo.org/live/20150712_0101_livestream.mp3 The passage he is referring to is the one from July 11 of this book: buddhanet.net/pdf_file/words_of_buddha.pdf Be well. – Robin111 Jul 12 '15 at 2:54
  • 1
    Thank you Robin both for the dhamma talk and the book. I appreciate it. I will take a look at it. I found a dhamma talk for you regarding one of your question about why anyone would want to go to the Heavenly Realms. I think it were Sankha K. who mentioned the Buddha and Tavatimsa Heaven. Here is a dhamma talk by Ajahn Punnadhammo (teaches the Mahasi-method) called The Buddha in Tavatimsa Heaven. I have not listened to it yet but i think there might be something interesting in it. – Lanka Jul 12 '15 at 12:27
  • 1
    Thank you very much! Looking forward to listening to it. :) – Robin111 Jul 12 '15 at 13:11
  • Welcome Robin:) – Lanka Jul 12 '15 at 13:52

As a Zen Monk I can answer the question regarding worldly participation in the following way. There is no definitive suggestion or rule within the Monastic Code of a Mahayana Monk. A Monk or Nun has no requirement to teach or not teach. Often the suggestion may come from the Senior Abbot that one should follow the teaching path. This is what happened in my case. Naturally the Abbot has to feel that the particular Monk or Nun has the required personal experience before they can teach others. I teach as often as I can and I am also the Buddhist Chaplain to a number of Hospitals. One should always direct the teaching at a level that would match the understanding of the audience. Thank you. Thay Tam Thien.


The main role of the monastic community is to preserve the Buddha's teaching, but I don't think that the Buddha gave a prescription on how exactly to do that. It's been left to each community to set rules of teaching and the level of community interaction. I don't think you're going to find one magic answer. In my tradition, you're expected to have some mastery over the subject matter before giving Dharma talks. It also helps to practice the Eightfold Path enough to where you are without reproach when you enter the community with instruction.

I don't believe it's wrong to participate and reach out to the community at any time. It just may not be helpful. Maybe like this post ;-) Then again, mastery is hard to see from the outside.

"Before Enlightenment chop wood, carry water.  After enlightenment chop wood, carry water."
  • 1
    Thank you for the answer Bhante. Could you elaborate on the enlightenment-quote? – Lanka Jul 24 '15 at 18:46
  • What is your tradition Bhante? – Ryan Jul 24 '15 at 21:18
  • @Lanka The quote is a Zen proverb: you might want to ask about it as a new/separate question. I wonder if it could be relevant to point to the tenth of the "Ten Bulls" as an illustration of it. – ChrisW Jul 18 '16 at 15:57
  • @Thanks Chris. I asked a question but only regarding the quote. – Lanka Jul 19 '16 at 11:11

No. Of course it can be a heavy attachment and diversion of the main task one has. Older say, sharing about 10-20% of time for lay people teaching is a proper way in training.

Don't forget, that the Buddha and some of his Arahat Disciple spend the rest of the life with teaching. On the other hand, there are other kind of arahats who do not teach at all, some can, some can and do, some do but can not...

There is how ever, not duty to teach at all.


In Christianity, priests generally do not meditate. Often, the sole role of a Catholic priest is to preach the religion to devotees.

In Asian Buddhism, the role of many monks is similar, which is why they devote most, if not all, of their time to teaching & conducting ceremonies. There are even Western monks, in Asia, that mostly teach & translate.

While I have never read it myself, I have heard the Buddha stated that monks who primarily meditate should not criticise monks who primarily study & teach. If this is true, then the dichotomy between 'meditation monks' & 'study/teaching monks' goes back to the time of the Buddha. A good example is Venerable Ananda, who often gives the impression in the suttas of not being a particularly adept meditation practitioner.

In my monastic experiences, I have not observed any correlation between teaching & practising the eightfold path. Often it is those that are seriously practising the eightfold path that do not teach.

There are highly reputed monks (eg. Ajahn Jayasaro) that spent many years as a (highly reputed) meditation monk before teaching extensively to the public.

  • "In Christianity, priests generally do not meditate" -- I'm pretty sure they're expected to "pray", at least, whatever that means. TBH I think it's often better to avoid saying things about non-Buddhist religions on this site. – ChrisW Jul 18 '16 at 15:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.