1

I am looking for the earliest possible version of the Mahā Karuṇā Dhāraṇī ("Great Compassion Mantra") in Sanskrit or Pali as part of tracing it's origins. My hope is to find the Chinese contributions. I suspect it can be found in a book, either in print or not, but entirely in Sanskrit. As I am not literate in this language it hinders my task.

Can anyone recommend where I can find such a book or source containing the text of the Mahā Karuṇā Dhāraṇī ("Great Compassion Mantra") dating before the first Chinese translation of 627 AD? Is there a library that one could recommend that would have a good chance of having it?

Thank you so much for any help you can give.

  • Is the Wikipedia version not enough? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… – yuttadhammo Mar 29 '15 at 14:30
  • Sadly not even close. DT Suzuki's English from 1915 is a problem. Prof. Lokesh Chandra has written about how Suzuki used both Sanskrit and Chinese texts for his translation. While this is fine for understanding it under the Mahayana flag in doesn't help with the origins and has problems according to Prof. Chandra. Anything written past it's introduction in China is suspect in this influence. I seem to be out of "digital road" and need to explore the analog world now. Thank you for your suggestion. - PM – Brian Mar 29 '15 at 18:07
  • But Wikipedia has the Sanskrit as well – yuttadhammo Mar 29 '15 at 18:09
  • The Vietnamese version of the Wikipedia article does have Sanskrit but I can't confirm it is correct or hasn't been influenced by the Chinese translation.1 Sadly I have yet to find a single version I can accept as authentic. Prof. Chandra's "Sanskrit texts from the Imperial Palace at Peking, in the Manchurian, Chinese, Mongolian and Tibetan scripts" should have the answer once I find said collection which is easier said then done. Thank you again for your time Venerable Yuttadhammo. I appreciate your time in this matter. - PM 1. goo.gl/sr6QnG (achive.org pdf) – Brian Mar 29 '15 at 18:57
  • While not quite what I was looking for this article gives me everything I need but actual confirmation of the source. Prof. Chandra might be the best voice on this subject and here's his words including his translation: himalaya.socanth.cam.ac.uk/collections/journals/kailash/pdf/… IMO that's the closest I've seen but I still need to confirm these are really Prof. Chandra's words. The whole article is a good read with very interesting conclusions. It seems the Wikipedia article is rather wrong. Thank you. Namo Buddhaya. PM – Brian Mar 30 '15 at 16:36
1

Generally speaking the study of dhāraṇī has been sorely neglected until very recently. As such there is very little published information on the subject. For example Paul William's standard text on Mahāyāna Buddhism contains no reference to dhāraṇī.

As the article by the Lokesh Chandra says, the earliest extant texts of this particular dhāraṇī date from the 7th century Chinese translations (T1057 + Siddhaṃ). I see no sign of an independent Sanskrit text anywhere, and Chandra doesn't cite one either. So the Sanskrit texts that are floating around are from one or another of the Chinese texts. And be warned that these are almost certainly unreliable - particularly the Siddham script version (ironically).

The fact that in the text, Avalokiteśvara has already taken on some of Śiva's attributes means that it was probably composed not much earlier than the 7th century. Nīlakaṇṭha is a name of Śiva, as is Īśvara (from Avalokita-īśvara). In Alexander Studholme's book Origins of Om maṇipadme hūṃ he notes that the assimilation of Śiva into Buddhism is a theme in the Kāraṇḍavyūha Sūtra which he dates to the 4th Century CE. I suspect that it must be a century or two later than this, just before the emergence of Tantric Buddhism. So the dhāraṇī in question is certainly no earlier than the 4th or 5th century CE.

The Sanskrit text looks to be mainly classical Sanskrit. Although this could just be the bias of editors who reconstructed the Sanskrit from the Chinese! Presuming that the transcription is accurate, it also argues for a date of not earlier than the 4th century CE, since before that time Buddhist texts were composed in Prakrit. Many dhāraṇī's, such as those included in the Saddharmapuṇḍarikā and Suvarṇabhāsottama Sūtras sometime around the 4th century CE, seem to have been composed in Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit. There never was any text like this in Pāḷi, although Gāndhārī is a possibility since many early Mahāyāna texts were composed in that language. However, very few Gāndhārī texts have been found and not all of them have been edited and published. But see for example the article by Ingo Stauch "The evolution of the Buddhist rakṣā genre in the light of new evidence from Gandhāra: The Manasvi-nāgarāja-sūtra from the Bajaur Collection of Kharoṣṭhī Manuscripts" in the BSOAS issue listed below

So it seems to me that you have the earliest text already and that looking for the "original" is probably not going to turn up any more information.

A couple of publications that you might want check are:

Copp, Paul. (2014) The Body Incantatory: Spells and the Ritual Imagination in Medieval Chinese Buddhism. Columbia University Press.

Studholme, Alexander (2002). The origins of oṃ manipadme hūṃ: a study of the Kāraṇḍavyūha Sūtra. Albany: State university of New York Press.

Also if you can get hold of it the Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, Volume 77 - Issue 01 - February 2014. The contents page is available here, and as you will see it has many articles on dhāraṇī.

There may be info in Esoteric Buddhism and the Tantras in East Asia edited by Charles Orzech, Henrik Sørensen, Richard Payne. I don't have it to hand and the Google Books version has no previews, though the word nīlakaṇṭha is mentioned several times.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.