1

In DN 16 it is written that:

"Then the Buddha came to the Ganges River.

Now at that time the Ganges was full to the brim so a crow could drink from it. Wanting to cross from the near to the far shore, some people were seeking a boat, some a dinghy, while some were tying up a raft. But, as easily as a strong person would extend or contract their arm, the Buddha, together with the mendicant Saṅgha, vanished from the near shore and landed on the far shore.

He saw all those people wanting to cross over. Knowing the meaning of this, on that occasion the Buddha was inspired to exclaim:

'Those who cross a river or stream have built a bridge and left the marshes behind. While some people are still tying a raft, intelligent people have crossed over.'"

My only question is how did such teleportation happen? Is it metaphorical?

What are your thoughts on it?

  • We shouldn't speculate much due to the Four Inconjecturables someone already mention in this thread. So, from a scientific perspective, looks like they've gained access to an extra dimension cuz beings in a higher dimension would be seen as gods to those in the lower ones for they can do simple things that seems impossible to do to the eye of the lower beings, as demonstrated by Prof. Carl Sagan here: youtube.com/watch?v=UnURElCzGc0 – santa100 Sep 22 at 15:12
3

Piya Tan's translation and commentary of DN 16 has two footnotes:

  1. The various texts differ regarding the details of the Buddha‘s crossing the Ganges. They however agree that he uses his psychic power to teleport himself and the order across the river. The redactors added this episode despite the Vinaya rule against the public display of psychic powers (Pāc 8 = V 4:25): see Kevaḍḍha S (D 11) = SD 1.7 Intro (3.3). The Pali texts apparently regard the episode as ―symbolic of the Buddha‘s attainment of the ̳other side‘ of transmigration, ie extinction (nirvana), by the power of meditation‖ (Warder 1970:71).

  2. According to the Sarvastivada account, only the Buddha crosses the Ganges by his own power. The monks swim across while other disciples build a raft (Waldschmidt 1950-51:158). The imagery here is obvious: the Buddha has crossed the ocean of suffering; his immediate disciples, the monks, crosses the river of suffering using their own effort; and the lay disciples are working at their own means of the salvation, the raft. On this verse, cf Dh 85.

| improve this answer | |
3

In Acintita Sutta: Unconjecturable (AN 4.77) it has mentioned that there are four things which are unconjecturable.

"There are these four unconjecturables that are not to be conjectured about, that would bring madness & vexation to anyone who conjectured about them. Which four?

"The Buddha-range of the Buddhas(1) is an unconjecturable that is not to be conjectured about, that would bring madness & vexation to anyone who conjectured about it.

"The jhana-range of a person in jhana...(2)

"The [precise working out of the] results of kamma...

"Conjecture about [the origin, etc., of] the world is an unconjecturable that is not to be conjectured about, that would bring madness & vexation to anyone who conjectured about it.

"These are the four unconjecturables that are not to be conjectured about, that would bring madness & vexation to anyone who conjectured about them."

Notes

(1.) I.e., the range of powers a Buddha develops as a result of becoming a Buddha.

(2.) I.e., the range of powers that one may obtain while absorbed in jhana.

As the blessed one said, I cannot think of how it would've happen. But with the emerge of the quantum physics, scientists built theories and tried to explain such teleportation behaviours. They have observed similar behaviour in quantum fields but unable to explain why and how it would've happen.

Bhikku Samahita discusses some of these behaviours found in Tipitaka in related to quantum mechanics through this video: Early Buddhism, Quantum Physics, & Relativity

| improve this answer | |
1

It's not real story of man crossing over a stream, but the wisdom of going further, to the farther shore of Truth. Don't believe in supernatural stuff. Enlightenment means losing everything, your senses, body, mind, sens of I and also spiritual powers, if any.

✓'Those who cross a river or stream have built a bridge and left the marshes behind. While some people are still tying a raft, intelligent people have crossed over.'"

::Meaning is simple:: When man start to the way of wisdom, the purity of stream enters through the gate of 💓. When one surrenders totally to it, he become one with stream. Then that river started to going towards the source, in reverse manner. Many disciple put hold something as goal, misses it for crossing over. Like holding onto the bridge, the raft etc. But, learned one go with the stream till the end without holding anything, not even boat. He place his foot on the farther side and leave alone the boat.Thats Arhatphala, Nirvana, Crossing over.

Also in one instace Buddha said, If I try to swim I get whirled about, I stay as steady, I drowned. So without swimming and remain steady, I find myself to the other shore. How? The truth is 'thou' are already there. But due to ignorance, you thinks you are in the stream. I hope it gets clear. ✓Upanishadic dictum also says the same: "Thou' are That." Thou' are not body, senses, feeling, sensation, perception, councioussnes. But thou' are supreme. Awake from sleep of ignorance and throw away what is not yours!

| improve this answer | |
  • I have personally experienced this. The farther shore is like this: There is no oasis situated yonder, what you stuck with is the mirage! How many efforts you try to reach it, it never be grasped. You run towards it your whole life, still the distance between the Shore and you will be exactly the same. So, you discard even that mirage and make no efforts. Lo! Wonder of wonder. You reached it finally without any of your efforts. That's the Truth like Flash of lightening, sudden. – Sandeep Telang Sep 25 at 14:03
0

Those who have achieved Nirvana have many magical powers. It did not happen metaphorically...It happened for real.

| improve this answer | |
0

It's always better to take what ever metaphorical in line with the Dhamma, as a reminder for thinking in dhammic ways, or to nourish Pasāda or Saddhā, as sample of path and gain of fruits, than to try to nail down phenomena in terms or real, because what is non-act-ually real? It leads and will lead and cause suffering grasping thing like in common way. As there is a Austrian proverb: it would just turn out into "controversies on the empires beard". At least, the Sublime Buddha taught that trying to imagine the transcend powers of the Tatagatha, conting also for Arahats, would lead to become crazy. And that's also said to waste not time in do this instead of turn to the path.

So in this way it might be enough for letting go of this instance, and step on further with things actually bringing benefit and how and what is real, or how things may arise and decay, will become clear anyway, as soon as done the task, of which isn't investigating to rebuild a history from far, far away.

Now since knowing that it's just a nice sign along the path but not it's aim, it's good after that (un-)rest to go on -- because time is running fast and human blessed existence is difficult to ever archieve: the water level already increases rapidly and the fire mass of suffering comes rolling on from behind.

[Note, as it would serve for it as well, it's not given for stacks, exchange, other world-binding trades but for release]

| improve this answer | |
  • 3
    In a (deleted) comment the OP wrote, "I am not a householder": so I deleted that. One SE rule is that users shouldn't address others using a title or pronoun which they ask you not to -- so I feel I should insist in this case that you needn't refer to user17389 as "householder". In fact the Help says, "Do not use signature, taglines, or greetings" -- the site's etiquette never requires you to add a "greeting", it's enough to only answer the question -- but if a user explicitly asks you not to greet them in a given way then it's important not to. – ChrisW Sep 22 at 13:07
-1

SN 51.22 explains how to do levitation. http://lucid24.org/sn/sn51/sn51-022/index.html

And it's not just the Buddha, or famous chief disciples. Anyone who develops a strong enough 4th jhana has the potential to master this ability.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.