I currently am taking care of an organic garden and minimizing any harm that could befall on any living beings by sustainable techniques, and on the side am helping to pick cherries and yet I have discovered that they use a product (insecticide) to treat the cherries. Am I somehow earning a wrong livelihood by picking them up ?

Considering the five different types of wrong livelihood AN 5.177

Monks, a lay follower should not engage in five types of business. Which five? Business in weapons, business in human beings, business in meat, business in intoxicants, and business in poison.

"These are the five types of business that a lay follower should not engage in.

May you be blessed.

1 Answer 1


Picking cherries is not a wrong livelihood as long as you are not the one spraying the pesticides.

Spraying pesticides is a wrong livelihood as it harms others (by doing activities which do not fall under right action to earn a living). Generally, distancing yourself from this activity would be fine as long as you can say free from remorse. If you are not involved in any way and this is out of your control there is nothing to be remorseful about it. If you still feel remorseful maybe it might be wise to find another side job.

Maintaining the organic garden within the law and ethical norms are definitely right livelihood.

The main objective in morality is Buddhism is to develop all other elements in the Noble Eightfold Path. Morality (3. Right speech 4. Right action 5. Right livelihood) helps develop mastery over the mind (6. Right effort 7. Right mindfulness 8. Right concentration) which intern helps wisdom (1. Right view 2. Right resolve). Right livelihood should be practised as a connected whole with other parts of the path so that one is free from remorse which helps develop meditation. If one is not free from remorse one cannot develop mentation and intern insight which is the pinnacle of the path.

(5) Bhikshus, for one with right livelihood, there is the withering away of wrong livelihood; and also the withering away of the many evil unwholesome states that arise with wrong view as condition,and the many wholesome states that arise with right livelihood as condition are fulfilled through cultivation.

Maha Cattarīsaka Sutta

  • 2
    I also garden as part of my practice. Thank you for addressing this issue.
    – OyaMist
    Commented Jun 6, 2020 at 13:34
  • 1
    Thank you for your thorough and very helpful response, it's bringing a lot of clarity for which I'm grateful. May I ask what fulfills these ethical norms concerning the gardening ? Commented Jun 6, 2020 at 18:14
  • 1
    What does not do harm to others or oneself and within the law is ethical. Commented Jun 7, 2020 at 2:10
  • 1
    If it is destined to produce wine, it would be. If it is just producing grapes not specifically for winemaking but some of the buyers may produce wine at their discretion then it will still be ok. Commented Jun 16, 2020 at 8:30
  • 1
    If it is involuntary then it does not breach ethics. But the main idea behind Buddhist ethics is to prevent karmic repercussions and also as a stepping stone in the path. In Buddhism unlike some contemporary teaching in India is not the be-all and end-all, but merely a stepping stone to the next steps in the path which falls under Samadhi, which again is a stepping stone to Panna which again is a stepping stone to Vimukthi. Hence, if one is disturbed to the extent one cannot successfully meditate develop Samadhi and Panna due to ethical concerns, one should better seek available alternatives. Commented Aug 26, 2020 at 12:58

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .