2

I've previously come across an incredible Buddhism resource that has escaped me. It was a website with a non-modern design, plenty of sub pages that were formed in a sequence in terms of how to study buddhism.

In particular:

  • there were different "levels" at which different techniques were appropriate and articles were split by the stages/levels
  • for each of these levels there were a lot of comparisons (e.g., what type of problem/need you can remove at that level, what meditation is applicable at level, the Truths, the Paths)
  • it was illustrated with quotes and pictures from the masters and written in Buddhist language, not a beginner-friendly wikiHow-like style
  • it was quite an extensive resource

The closest comparison I've found is the Basic Buddhism Guide on Buddhanet , but was I'm looking for was a less modern website, with more pictures and written in a more traditional style.

3
  • What tradition was it? Theravada, Mahayana, Tibetan, Zen? Maybe details like this could help people locate it? Feb 6 '20 at 13:51
  • Absolutely - I'm 90% sure it was Vipassana, 10% chance it was Zen! Sorry wish I could remember precisely, it's between those two though.
    – Peteris
    Feb 6 '20 at 14:10
  • As for the 1. Step: Better to Give than to Consume. The next would come by given cause.
    – user11235
    Feb 10 '20 at 23:12
2

Just a shot in the dark as I am not sure how well it matches your description, but could it be this? https://studybuddhism.com/

That site used to have an older version that was decidedly less modern and had the feeling of a much older website, but it has been updated recently.

1
  • Thanks a lot for sharing, unfortunately not this one, it was a lot less modern and the language was more traditional (as if taken from a Buddhism book), but the content was similar in structure.
    – Peteris
    Feb 6 '20 at 14:11
0

Could be this:

https://accesstoinsight.org/

It’s Theravadan.

2
  • I don't think that describes "different levels" etc., nor say much about meditation, nor have pictures -- (which were all part of the OP's description).
    – ChrisW
    Feb 10 '20 at 19:56
  • That's right :(, it's not the one.
    – Peteris
    Feb 12 '20 at 11:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.