Do Buddhists argue over topics? Wouldn't that be unwholesome and view clinging?

  • Suggestion: 'Debate' may be a better word to phrase your question to maintain neutrality. ('Argue' may not be the best word to use if I am correct about the context of your question) – Krizalid_13190 Nov 19 at 3:32
  • Ddebating is an effective method for learning. The word 'arguing' suggests something more egotistical than debating, and as you say it can spill over into clinging and dogmatism. – PeterJ Nov 26 at 13:42
  • @Krizalid_13190 Call it "arguing" or "debating" as you wish -- if you think the difference is important you could explain that in an answer. – ChrisW Nov 26 at 23:03

Arguing depends upon person to person. Buddha always forbid arguing. Even at time of buddha , few of his disciples used to argue & he ,by many Upmas(lessons), used to forbid everyone to argue.

By wearing a tag of buddhism or any other tradition , doesn't mean person has become an enlightened one. If somebody is not ready to accept , it's good -let this go otherwise ,if accepts ,it's good ,still ,whatever the case is ,one must be ready to learn(if same is unenlightened) ,mustn't stick to blind-faith.

Moreover , dhamma-discussion can be done peacefully , buddha never restricted dhamma_related_discussion. You are your own master , you cannot force anyone to accept your views ,if you are forcing or arguing that means you are clinging & this is unwholesome.

Above is for full_time meditators.

For house holders::

Sometimes ,it becomes necessary to argue ,not to fulfill your desire but saving someone's life ,taking important decisions for benefit of large amount of people,etc. In such cases , arguing becomes necessary ,still this must be done while maintaining basic 5 Percepts at body & mental level.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.