1

This question already has an answer here:

I have had the impression that "self" has at least sometimes been thought of as "something" other than the 5 aggregates.

What does "self" mean?

What is "sense of self"?

marked as duplicate by ChrisW Jul 28 at 20:37

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

locked by ChrisW Jul 28 at 20:56

This post has been locked while disputes about its content are being resolved. You may discuss this on meta if you have concerns.

Read more about locked posts here.

  • The Dhamma says that dhammas are non-self -- and that questions-about-self is unwise attention which leads to a thicket of views -- so I don't know how to answer this question! – ChrisW Jul 28 at 19:22
  • 1
    But then how is one supposed to understand the words "dhammas are non-self" then? How is one supposed to understand any statement that uses the word "self" without knowing what is meant by "self"? – Angus Jul 28 at 19:31
1

The fear about questions about self is misplaced. What is intended by that admonition is refraining from speculations about the origin or destiny, or existence or non-existence of a self.

What the questioner is asking, I believe, is the definition in Buddhism of Self, and that is a legitimate question to ask and answer.

The answer is that it is that which one believes is under one's control (the scope goes beyond the individual body; usually expressed as 'self or what relates to self'). And further, though it is description by negative, it is the idea that a self under one's control would not suffer pain or come to an end.

The Dhamma points out that there is only one thing that is under one's control, and that is one's acts of mind, speech or body. The outcome of one's acts, however, is out of one's control.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.