What's the history behind this? I am assuming non-Theravada monks eat after noon, and use money. Correct me if I'm wrong.

If I'm not wrong, why do the sects differ in this manner?

  • There are Theravada monks that eat after noon and use money.
    – A Nonimous
    Sep 1, 2014 at 15:27
  • 1
    There are, but it's against the rules.
    – Bakmoon
    Sep 1, 2014 at 19:44

4 Answers 4


They differ for any number of reasons. For one, there are at least five different 'official' versions of the vinaya - each of which is prominent in different countries. The rules in each vary slightly - some have more rules, some have less, some place greater emphasis on different things, etc. A lot of it also has to do with tradition and the culture where Buddhism is practiced. If there is one thing you say about Buddhism it's that it very much malleable to local custom.

A very good example of this is Japan. Some monks there will accept money such as for funeral services. Many will eat after noon, despite the injunction not to - it's just called "medicine" instead of a meal! My own teacher's teacher really loved his sake despite that being a fairly clear violation of the fifth precept. Some Japanese monks, believe or not, even get married.

I think it's helpful not to view Buddhism as a monolithic entity. It really is as complex as the people practicing it.

  • That is a very good example indeed, although they may dress up like monks, have their heads shaven, and call themselves "monks", they are not, by far, a true Buddhist monk.
    – dhammarak
    Sep 2, 2014 at 19:45
  • I'm not sure I'd call the sangha monolithic either. ;-)
    – user698
    Sep 2, 2014 at 19:56
  • @Dhammarakkhita: What is a "true" Buddhist monk? What more is there to distinguish monasticism from laicism than whether you prioritize spiritual and worldly matters? Being a monk is most certainly not about appearances. Those are ultimately worldly.
    – back2dos
    Sep 3, 2014 at 8:22
  • Monks in Japan aren't ordained under the Vinaya like they are in most of the rest of the Buddhist world, but under a separate system of vows based on the Mahayana Brahmajala Sutra, and they don't have any rules about money or eating in the afternoon so I think it is rather unfair to criticize them for that.
    – Bakmoon
    Sep 4, 2014 at 0:52

Bhikkshu Pratimoksha As far as I know (and I verified this with a Chinese Malaysian monk), the pratimoksha is what non-Theravada monks follow. It is more or less the same but has 250 rules over the Theravada 227. The extra rules however, can be found more or less in the Theravada Culavagga or Mahavagga. (Generally known, but I did not verify)

The rule on money is very basic and part of the 10 precepts. The same with eating after 12 Noon. The rule however mentions "gold or silver" as the wording and is defined in the vibhanga as anything dealing with money or trade. I remember once hearing that Mahayana follows a different interpretation of their rules. This may be where it might be "allowable."

A long time ago, in Myanmar, I once traveled with a "vinaya" Mahayana monk from Malaysia. He did not use money. They had two monks in his monastery including himself. It was the only one in Malaysia as far as I could remember (I think I asked him). When we stopped the car to urinate in the forest, he did his business while standing up, which is against the rules. We must squat. I remember asking him about this, and that was where I was told that they follow a different commentary. This commentary seemed to render many of the 250 rules as obsolete. However, this monk did not use money, so I presume that rule was left intact.

I welcome a Mahayana monks to edit this post.


One has to distinguish between monks/nuns that follow a Vinaya and those that do not follow. You may have monks that use such title but cannot be regarded as true monks because they have not been ordained in accordance with, and follow the Vinaya rules.

In the pali suttas the Buddha says that he teaches the Dhamma and Vinaya, i.e. the Doctrine and Discipline. So, it is fair to say that a monk or nun who does not follow the Vinaya rules cannot be regarded as a true Buddhist monk or nun.

A monk/nun which follows the Vinaya is not allowed to eat after midday and to handle money. There are some food items allowed after midday but those are specified in the rules.

  • The question is about non-Theravada monks, so whatever is in the Pali suttas doesn't seem to be relevant.
    – michau
    Sep 2, 2014 at 16:21
  • OK, sorry. The same can be found in the sutras of the Chinese Agamas. Both collections - Suttas in Pali and Agamas in Chinese are widely considered as containing the earliest teachings of the Buddha. So, based on the teachings of the Agamas any non-Theravada monk/nun who does not follow the Vinaya rules cannot be regarded as a true Buddhist monk/nun. Besides the Pali Vinaya there is the Mula-sarvastivada Vinaya and the Dharamaguptaka Vinaya. All Vinayas agree about the restriction to eat food after midday and to handle money.
    – dhammarak
    Sep 2, 2014 at 19:28
  • Certain Mahayana has a rule that forbids laypersons to study Vinaya, which in my opinion, an obstacle for laypersons to recognize true monks and nuns.
    – fxam
    Sep 3, 2014 at 5:10

Many Chinese Buddhists mistakenly think that Mahayana Buddhism teaches the practice of vegetarianism, and confuse ‘Chi Su’ (vegetarianism) with ‘Chi Zhai’ (not eating after noon until the next dawn). In the early Suttas, ‘Chi Su’ is said to be the unbeneficial ascetic practice of external sects. ‘Chi Su’ is practiced by Han Chuan (Chinese Buddhism), not Bei Chuan (Mahayana Buddhism), since Tibetan and Japanese Buddhists are not vegetarians. Chinese emperor Liang Wu Di commanded Buddhist monks and nuns to eat vegetarian food. The word ‘Zhai’ means not eating at certain hours, i.e. fasting. Thus the Muslim fasting month of Puasa is called ‘Kai Zhai’. The Buddha taught his disciples to ‘Chi Zhai’, i.e. not to eat (with exception of medical allowances) from noon until the next dawn (1 p.m. till 7 a.m. in Malaysia). In Han Chuan this ‘Chi Zhai’ became synonymous with ‘Chi Su’.

  • The question was, "are non-Theravada monks allowed to eat after noon?" (the question wasn't asking about vegetarianism).
    – ChrisW
    May 29, 2016 at 22:16

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .