2

I've quoted below from Ratana Sutta (The Discourse on the Jewels).

Ye ariyasaccāni vibhāvayanti
Gambhīrapaññena sudesitāni
Kiñcāpi te honti bhusappamattā
Na te bhavam atthamam ādiyanti
Idam pi sanghe ratanam panītam
Etena saccena suvatthi hotu

~ Cited from: Ratana Sutta (Pāli Text)

which means;

Those who clearly distinguish the noble truths,
which have been well preached by the one with great wisdom,
no matter how great they become in heedlessness
still they do not take up an eighth existence—
this excellent treasure is in the Sangha:
by virtue of this truth may there be safety!

~ Cited from: Ratana Sutta | The Discourse on the Treasures

According to the above, stream-enterer will not have an eighth existence (re-appearing) no matter how great he/she become in heedlessness. Does it mean that a stream-enterer will become an Arahant within his/her next seven existences even without any effort?

If so, why would someone put an extra effort to become an Arahant after becoming a stream-enterer?

3

The Pali word translated as "existence" is "bhava". "Bhava" is a mental asava (defilement) and not another life. There are 10 fetters to break through for Arahantship. The stream-enterer has broken three fetters. Each fetter is a type of becoming. Therefore, the sutta says "they do not take up an eighth becoming" because there are only a maximum of 7 more fetters to break..

In summary, it is pointless asking about stream-entry if you believe in reincarnation because this just perpetuates the "self-view" that must be broken for stream-entry. When there is the belief in reincarnation, it is the belief of "I will reincarnated or reborn seven more times". This is self-view.

The stream-enterer, in the suttas, has the realisation of: "All that is subject to arising is subject to cessation". The realisation of the stream-enterer is not: "All that is subject to cessation is subject to re-arising".

  • Sir, I would say not "I" but "five aggregates/name & form/Six internal sense bases will be re-appeared up to seven times". I suppose the "bhava" here is the same "kamma bhava" in dependent origination. Hence it will lead to "birth" (or re-appear) of five aggregates in another existence. – Damith Feb 7 at 3:12
  • Sir, "Each fetter is a type of becoming." I cannot understand this. Can you explain a bit more or can you give me a reference in the Pali canon? – Damith Feb 7 at 3:18
  • @Damith Hi again! Thanissaro's essay "The Paradox of Becoming" may shed some light into this topic. Kind regards! accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/… – Brian Díaz Flores Feb 7 at 4:32
3

Attaining Stream Entry is like attaining a black belt in martial arts (real deal black belt, not McDonald-style handout type). Once one's practiced for that long and that consistent to be able to earn it, any subsequent task s/he has to do after that is no longer a struggling tedious chore. It's become his passion, his way of life. Stream Entry is also like that. No doubt there's still work to be done and effort to be made, but unlike us wordlings who still have to struggle to march forward, the Stream Enterer has done it long enough and hard enough such that the practice has become second nature to him. Hence the natural non-retrogression and the at-most 7 lives warranty.

2

Buddha enlightens Nibbāna as Arahanta by meditating Noble Eightfold Path, included the right effort in Dhammacakkappavattanasutta:

Precisely this Noble Eightfold Path: right view, right resolve, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, right concentration.

So, the right effort to cease seven high-level fetters still required for the stream-enterer.

However, the stream-enterer already has the automatic effort of ceasing the three low-level fetters, it guarantees the stream-enterer going to enlighten as Arahanta inside seven rebirths.

0

The experience of Nibbana is an unique situation. After the first experience, the person will continue to have that unique experience time to time. Experiencing Nibbana starts the process of involuntary and natural process of purification of this person's mind. It's generally not a very fast process. But after the first experience of Nibbana there is no turning back. The person is guaranteed to become completely free from suffering and attain Arahanthood in the future. It's like being sucked to a black hole. Even you want to turn back, you can't do it. So yes, become a stream-enterer is enough. Either in Seven Life times or in a shorter period of time, Arahanthood is guaranteed. But that max. Seven Life times can be in Heaven Realms too.

So effort is obviously not necessary for a Stream-Enterer to make progress in freedom from suffering because s/he is in an involuntary and spontaneous process of purification and disidentification. Also effort and "trying mode" can be harmful for a Stream-Enterer because s/he is in the transition period. A Stream-Enterer already involuntarily and spontaneously meditates every moment in his/her daily life. But after the transition from Sotapanna to Sakadagami some special methods and returning to the "formal meditator" mode can be helpful to move forward more quickly. But I think we can't call it "effort" because in the next Enlightenment Stages the person has continous peace of mind and contentment. So whatever s/he is doing, we can not say that it is "trying" or "putting effort".

0

Nyom Damith,

7 more lifes mean 7 times aging, sickness and death: huge suffering not only for one self, but for many, as life requires food.

Does one like to cause another mother and so many others so much pain like in this existence already did? Something one should think about when up to laziness.

My person guesses only Mohayana-confused continue to cause and nurish suffering in the world, telling they make it out of compassion.

Or the livingroom Āhārahats, open to lead a holly life but prefer to be "enlightened householder" with a "secure" refrigerator next.

Things one should really honest consider, especially the "compassionate" ones.

Because people tend to over-estimate there qualities and not seeing that certain easy, merits, are not for sure, the Buddha did not taught much about it, only in one case.

[This answer is given for liberation, not for exchange, stackes, trade... in the world and might be well deleted if space here is not given for such]

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.