Is it reasonable to call these truths, or would it be more reasonable to call them accurate statements from two different frames of reference?
The truth, from the frame of reference of conditioned experience, is emptiness.
The truth, from the frame of reference of the unconditioned, is neither the condition of emptiness, nor the condition of non-emptiness, neither both nor neither.
.. In that a statement with regards to the ultimate is false from a conditioned frame, and a statement with regards to the conditioned is false from the ultimate frame, how can either one declare any 'satya'?