Some suttas and the dhammapada contain stories with things not very easy to verify, such as people flying, living 8.000 years, teletransportation, etc.

Some of those are related to the psychic powers of the Buddha and that is easier to believe as he was an enlightened being; however some are not related to that.

Buddha always encouraged us to verify and contemplate things. Will having doubt about Buddhist stories and legends interfere with Buddhist practice?

  • Relative to which tradition? Secular Buddhism is a thing and it dispenses with the unverifiable stories. For the rest I'd have to check on a case by case basis. For example, some monks in the Shingon tradition took all that stuff pretty literally, Dogen in the Zen tradition was pretty skeptical for his time, and so on. Jul 20, 2014 at 0:35
  • I agree that it changes from tradition to tradition, but my point is: These stories have been told from generation to generation, is there any chance that at some point people exagerated a little bit? I dont know. Most of those stories are on suttas and dhammapada, so are present in both mahayana and theravada traditions.
    – konrad01
    Jul 20, 2014 at 0:43
  • 1
    The questions that work best on a stack exchange site are the ones that have answer that you could hypothetically mark as an answer. As written, and without reference to any particular tradition this is a survey/discussion question. If you ask me, dispense with the stories, there are other more interesting parts to the religion. But I'm just a random opinion and enough of those just creates noise. Jul 20, 2014 at 0:47
  • 1
    I submitted an edit to (hopefully) help the question to fit into the structured Q & A format better. Please feel free to reject changes if they lose too much of your original intent.
    – Robin111
    Jul 20, 2014 at 11:53
  • thanks friends, I will try to "fit" the question, specially the future ones, buddhism is not so simple and most of the subjects have many different interpretations, therefore I think it is ok for one person to find a question clear and other to find it a bit unclear. Regarding the format for Q&A I think we can have a standard which I will try my best to fit :)
    – konrad01
    Jul 20, 2014 at 14:58

3 Answers 3


You should not believe all the stories to become a Buddhist dear friend. Instead you should believe Noble Eightfold Path and taking refuge in the triple Gems (Load Buddha, Dhamma and Sangha). Taking refuge doesn't mean that the person has to pray for them or looking forward until they do something for you. We have to believe Lord Buddha, Dhamma and Sangha then we have to follow the path which is showed by them. They are guides and helpers so followers have to follow the path.

If someone loose their courage to follow the path due to the stories that is the best enmity one can do for him/her self. First clarify everything about Noble Eightfold Path and follow it. Then when you gaining wisdom due to the follower, you will be able to identify whether the stories are true or false.

when talking about teleportation, we are in a era of quantum teleportation. even now with the existing technology we can perform teleportation on quantum particles like photons. but the problem is on the communication channels. if we divide our body into quantum particles and begin to teleport them, it will take millions of years to complete. If scientists develop a mechanism to build high speed communication channel with using quantum entanglement, we will have a teleportation era in near future. So don't categorize stories just as fairy tails or believe at once. Remember stories and follow the path then you will find facts do decide.

  • Good point on the noble eightfold path! Good answer, I agree that what is more important is to put the teachings into practice, it is just that some stories are not easy to verify and may look very strange specilly for beginners, so I was wondering how to explain that for beginners. Thanks, good answer
    – konrad01
    Jul 20, 2014 at 14:51
  • It is great pleasure to help you my dear friend. I know it is very hard to find the truth in this world. At the beginning I was also confused. But when reading, best way which I found was compare new facts when there is contradiction. So we have to refuse some points and accept others. But if you need to trust, there is no other option except practical implementation. Obviously there are no harm in them. Feel the relaxation of Dhamma with practice. All the best!
    – Gurusinghe
    Jul 20, 2014 at 15:20

A real Buddhist is a person who takes refuge in the Buddha, Dhamma and Sangha. Dhammapada, along with it's stories are a part of the Dhamma. So if you reject the stories and still claim to be a Buddhist, you are essentially saying that you don't accept those stories as a part of the Dhamma. But it's a bad practice for a person to start deciding what parts of the Tipitaka or commentaries belong to the Dhamma. Especially someone who's neither enlightened nor omniscient. Because that habit can leak into much more important teachings as well. Like questioning if there's rebirth or Nibbana. Because you don't yet know them by direct knowledge, just like psychic powers. So you are taking them on faith.

There's a way to attain psychic powers and it's explained in the text. Just like the way to attain Nibbana. So why not take psychic powers on faith too? It's not like you can disprove them.

Vicicicca(doubt) is one of five hindrances obstructing the path. You are rejecting the stories because of your Vicicicca. Not because of your direct understanding that the stories are false. So you are actually empowering a mental state which is harmful to the path instead of gaining any real knowledge about the authenticity of the stories. On the other hand, if you can simply accept them on faith, Vicicicca has little room to enter your mind. That'll also make you less distracted when you listen to the Dhammapada.


Faith is for fools and advanced practitioners. That sort of practice is called "guru yoga" in Tibetan Buddhism. There they require you be an advanced practitioner before initiating you into that practice. And, in the past for the monastics, the guru then was responsible to provide food, shelter, and teachings for the person taking the vow. There is nothing wrong with being a "fool" for a particular religion (or more probably a particular teacher) but,if one is going to do that, one had better make sure that one is placing one's faith in the right teacher. I don't find "blind faith" useful in my practice. If Buddhism has truth (as I think it does), I don't think it needs its practitioners to practice blind faith. If blind faith is necessary, I will probably wander off somewhere else.

Trust is built on verifiable statements or personal experience. The "Western" students seem to respond better to examples of holiness, rather than descriptions of holiness. (If this method really works, then there ought to be examples existing today. And there are. Just really hard to find, for some reason.) Actual meditation practice, like fitness, seems to follow the "you get out of it what you put into it" policy. "Personal Experience" is only applicable to the one having the experience, but is no less useful. Ultimately, it's all about what works for you. Buddhism has quite a few traditions (and sub-schools). One of them may be for you.

  • Thanks, I have been in 3 different schools and I made a decision which one to follow, however all schools accept the stories because they are part of the core material of buddhism, I can believe in some of them, but others really require a lot of faith, so I wonder: Maybe it is just the way it has been written, those stories came from generation to generation 2.500 years ago, maybe some misinterpretation or some extrapolation happened here and there and the story became more mystical... I dont know
    – konrad01
    Jul 21, 2014 at 13:50

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .