In saccapabba of mahāsatipaṭṭhānasutta:
- Jāti is "khandhānaṃ patubhāvo" and "āyatanānaṃ paṭilābho".
- Khandhānaṃ patubhāvo included viññāṇa-khandha.
- Viññāṇa-khandha is viññāṇa-paṭiccasamuppāda.
- Rūpa-paṭiccasamuppāda is rūpa-khandha.
- Nāma-paṭiccasamuppāda is vedanā-, saññā-, saṇkhāra-khandha (cetana, phassa, manasikāra; see: sammādiṭṭhisuttaṃ).
- Those nāma- and rūpa-paṭiccasamuppāda are piyarūpa/sātarūpa.
- 60 piyarūpa/sātarūpa: 6 outer āyatana, 6 āyatana-paṭiccasamuppāda, 6 viññāṇa-paṭiccasamuppāda, and 42 nāma-paṭiccasamuppāda (6 vedana-paṭiccasamuppāda, 6 saññā-khandha, 6x5 saṇkhāra-khandha [phassa-paṭiccasamuppāda, cetanā-paṭiccasamuppāda, vitakka, vicāra, taṇhā-paṭiccasamuppāda]).
So jāti-paṭiccasamuppāda is viññāna-paṭiccasamuppāda.
The difference is: Jāti-paṭiccasamuppāda is 5 khandha. So jāti is a conclusion of viññāna, nāma+rūpa, āyatana, phassa, vedanā, taṇhā, upādāna and bhavā-paṭiccasamuppāda. But viññāṇa-paṭiccasamuppāda is an explanation of jhāti.
So sacca-pabba is the reason that commentary commented "Viññāṇa Is Jāti And Paṭisandhi", right?