Were there 27 more Buddhas before Siddhartha Gautam Buddha? If so, are there any evidences of it. How about the finding of Buddhist Stupas and Idols in Harappa civilization?Is it linked with this fact?

  • kindly please refer to this answer – aknay Jun 7 '17 at 13:15
  • Endless before and endless to come, consider infinite space/time and the cyclical/dynamic/(I-change, I-ching 易經) of the cosmos(es). For instant, 大通智勝佛 (Buddha MahaPrajna?) spent 10 Kalpas in Samadhi to acquire the Buddha Dharma is one other than the 27. – Mishu 米殊 Jun 7 '17 at 16:47

Were there 27 more Buddhas before Siddhartha Gautam Buddha?

Yes, the Buddha speaks of them in his suttas, many of them from different times/planets throughout the universe(s).

If so, are there any evidences of it.

Other than the suttas themselves, yes in various other religious traditions.

How about the finding of Buddhist Stupas and Idols in Harappa civilization? Is it linked with this fact?

Yes it could be but rather than spending our lifetime endlessly trying to settle historical matters and learn other histories, let us be grateful for what the Gautama Buddha has provided us: a complete, methodical practice towards Enlightenment. We will need to devote whatever spare time aside from job and other duties to achieve what he achieved and the Buddhas after him (Padmasambhava). The other Buddhisms that stemmed from Hinayana Buddhism suggest there is a greater journey towards Complete Enlightenment and complete power, even after initial srotipanna and escaping the force of rebirth. No need to excavate skeletons--it was hard enough for the Buddha to leave behind what he has and those after him.

| improve this answer | |
  • The teaching/practice is more important than history, agree. Unless one developed the Iddhi ability to know directly, else history is just another one telling his version of the story. However, I wonder if Padmasambhava should be regarded as - in the official sequential of Buddhas in our Loka? Padma. is Bud. Shakyamuni in some tradition. Sutra 《佛説千佛因緣經》translated Kumarajiva, few pages only, lists thousand Buddhas and the previous Buddha Dipamkara etc. with very interesting accounts of them. – Mishu 米殊 Jun 7 '17 at 16:41
  • Please quote all of these suttas where the Buddha speaks of past Buddhas. Thanks – Dhammadhatu Jun 7 '17 at 20:58
  • @Dhammadhatu If someone convicted to a dictionary that has only collection of A to D the rest E to Z missing, it's futile to reconcile the knowledge on E to Z; Sutra name provided in previous comment. Buddha Dipamkara must have been mentioned in the Pali Sutta as if words of C shared among these two dictionaries. Buddha 樓至 doesn't, same as words of K can't be found in one of the dictionaries. – Mishu 米殊 Jun 8 '17 at 12:56
  • @Dhammadhatu It's better to be a Buddhavacana-mysophobe than the fanatics though. Fanatics were the material used by the ambitious to trumpet the Crusade/Holy War. Fanatics lose their mind of discern, the elementary instruction of the Buddha to his students. Even the lame Wikipedia has collected some insights on pre-sectarian Buddhism en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-sectarian_Buddhism, read those others with discern, than believed in blind faith on the promoted Theosophist Edward Conze's. – Mishu 米殊 Jun 8 '17 at 13:04

Yes there were three Buddha's before Gautam Buddha and they were all historical persons . If you read the travel record of Fahian and huen tsang they clearly write that we have visited the stupa of Kakusandh Buddha , and Kassapa Buddha . King Asok in his Nigliwa inscription write "here at this place I doubled the size of stupa of Konagaman Buddha " . This is a very clear Indication that Kakusandh Buddha , Konagaman Buddha , Kassapa Buddha were real historical persons and this fact link Buddhist religion with Indus Valley .

| improve this answer | |

Personally, I do not believe there were any Buddhas before Gotama.

This is why there is probably no evidence.

The idea of past Buddhas is found only a few suttas among thousands, where, in those suttas, the technology mentioned, such as chariot-making or potting, was the same as in the Buddha's time.

| improve this answer | |
  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. – user2424 Jun 9 '17 at 9:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.