This question already has an answer here:

I always wondered why do people that practice Buddhist practices, label or opt not to label themselves "Buddhist".

marked as duplicate by Crab Bucket, ChrisW Jun 13 '16 at 17:17

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • Possible duplicate of Should one call oneself a Buddhist? – Crab Bucket Jun 13 '16 at 9:17
  • Uilium, do you think the questions are duplicate (i.e. do the answers to that question answer your question)? Or are they slightly different (e.g. that one is asking whether they should, and this one is asking why they do)? If you don't think they're duplicate, is this one a "polling" question of the sort that's usually off-topic (e.g. are you asking everyone to explain why they do or don't label themselves)? – ChrisW Jun 13 '16 at 10:38
  • @ChrisW Ok, I think I should reword it. Maybe put it on hold until I can get to it later. – Lowbrow Jun 13 '16 at 16:40

All labels are conventions & attachment to mental states of non-becoming can make the mind uncomfortable with conventions.

Also, the term 'Buddhist' is a stereotype, loaded with all kinds of worldly connotations, such as believing in the Dalai Lama, reincarnation, statues, etc.

Those people might be more comfortable if asked: "Do you practise the teachings (path) of the Buddha?".

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.