I think the question is clear so no further explanation is needed.

  • Question closed due to being primarily opinion-based and too subjective in nature. Please see "What types of questions should I avoid asking?" in the Help Center.
    – user2424
    Apr 3 '16 at 14:30
  • 1
    this question falls under "Acinteyya" : en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acinteyya ,
    – Ryan
    Apr 4 '16 at 0:28
  • @Lanka I think this question should be reopened. The Tibetan Buddhist answer to this is specific, and I believe the other schools of Buddhism are in agreement that there is no first cause, no first birth.
    – hellyale
    Apr 4 '16 at 4:51
  • 1
    actually I think it is a duplicate of buddhism.stackexchange.com/questions/9973/first-life-in-samsara/…
    – hellyale
    Apr 4 '16 at 4:58
  • @Hellyale. I will reopen the question as I see it has gained upvotes and that 3 users have submitted reopen-votes. I still think the question is lacking content and is too subjective in nature. Lets see what happens from here.
    – user2424
    Apr 4 '16 at 17:36

Do you think someone might have asked that question before?

According to Access to Insight, many of the suttas include the following quote,

At Savatthi. There the Blessed One said:

"From an inconstruable beginning comes transmigration. A beginning point is not evident, though beings hindered by ignorance and fettered by craving are transmigrating & wandering on.

In other words the "first" is not evident (or, I'd read that as, it's not evident that there is a first).

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.