6

In DP Verse 25, we read about Arhat Culapanthaka displaying psychic powers (appearing as many) to possibly a lay person, i.e. the messenger:

When the messenger from the house of Jivaka arrived at the monastery he found not only one bhikkhu, but a thousand identical bhikkhus.

Now it's popularly known that according to the Vinaya, Bhikkhu are prohibited from displaying psychic powers to lay persons (Kevatta Sutta DN 11). If so, was this display by Arhat Culapanthaka,

  1. before the vinaya prohibiting such displays,
  2. performed unaware of such a rule,
  3. exempt from the rule,
  4. not exempt from the rule, but the intention and effect due to the display of such powers, was of greater benefit than non display.
  5. other
1

It was not a show for people, that's the first thing you have missed. Here is how it went and what you missed,

The function in doctor Jeewaka's house was attended by the monks of the temple and Ven. Arhat Culapanthaka was at the temple/monastery. As Ven.Arhat Culapanthaka was alone and there was work to be done multiple bodies were used to clean the temple,to sweep it and do some other petty tasks. This is when the messenger from Doc.Jeevaka's house came and saw this.


Sometimes when arahats feel that more harm can come to a society or a person by not revealing his true status the Arahat does some suitable task to prove him that. This was first done by Lord Buddha to tame the ego of "Jatila sages" who thought they are Arahat and Lord Buddha was not. It was done again to tame the ego of the "Shakya cast" who were is relatives of prince siddhartha.

What we need to understand is that Arahat does not break "Vinaya (laws & guidelines of Buddhism)" no matter what. And that has been clearly stated in Buddhism. So there is no point in Scrutinizing the "Seela" or the conviction of an Arahat because it is not up to petty beings like us. Like always it has happened it should happen by the hands of another Arahat.

  • 1
    Thanks Theravada. You raise a valid point that I missed that the psychic display was performed in front of one person. – Kaveenga Wijayasekara Jan 14 '16 at 12:12
  • 1
    So it seems that the messenger witnessed an in-progress psychic phenomena which was not meant for him. The messenger baffled by seeing many Bhikkhu when he expected only one Bhikkhu turned back. During the messenger's 2nd visit to the monastery had the Arhat reverted the many forms into a singular form that would have been displaying a psychic power, and instead the many forms answers truthfully that they each are Chulapantaka. – Kaveenga Wijayasekara Jan 14 '16 at 12:22
  • 1
    @ Theravada: where is it said that an Arhat will not break any (major and minor) Vinaya/monastic rules? Wrt to virtue yes, there will be no transgression, but my understanding that with regards to vinaya rules on etiquette, conventional manners, there could be transgressions. – Kaveenga Wijayasekara Jan 14 '16 at 12:25
  • @KaveengaWijayasekara , As the teaching goes an arahat is a person who is only second to a Buddha when it comes to the understanding about dhamma. But what about "vinaya"? , As you already know all the Buddhist councils were done by the hands of the arahats and not by ordinary monks no matter how good they were, this happened because of one reason..... – Theravada Jan 14 '16 at 18:23
  • This happened because of one reason, As you already know there is a thing called "Thri shiksha (seela,samadhi,prachna)". To be a one who has ended the path (Arahat) he or she must reach the very peak of "Thri shiksha". Because as Buddhism clearly teach the Seela of an Arahat is unmatched by any other, the Samadhi of an Arahat is unmatched by any other, the panha/prachna of an Arahat is unmatched by any other.... @KaveengaWijayasekara – Theravada Jan 14 '16 at 18:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.