The suttas don't talk about jhāna nimitta, but they do talk about samādhi nimittas. In MN 44
https://lucid24.org/mn/main/mn044/index.html#44.4
cattāro sati-’paṭṭhānā samādhi-nimittā; four remembrance-establishings
(are) undistractable-lucidity-themes.
Any topic for satipatthana "mindfulness", can be a topic for samādhi nimitta, or a subject for jhāna meditation to investigate with dhamma-vicaya, vitakka and vicāra, upekkha, sati and sampajāno in the higher jhānas.
The nimitta of samādhi can be visual, or conceptual, and both, just as it can be in guarding the sense doors.
In AN 4.14
https://lucid24.org/an/main/an04/index.html#4.14
samādhi nimitta suggested one develps are the corpse in various stages.
Idha, bhikkhave, bhikkhu uppannaṃ bhaddakaṃ samādhinimittaṃ
anurakkhati aṭṭhikasaññaṃ puḷavakasaññaṃ vinīlakasaññaṃ
vicchiddakasaññaṃ uddhumātakasaññaṃ. It’s when a monk preserves a
meditation subject that’s a fine basis of undistractible-lucidity: the
perception of a skeleton, a worm-infested corpse, a livid corpse, a
split open corpse, or a bloated corpse.
you asked
Is this subhanimitta the same as the nimitta for entering jhana?
If the nimitta is subha (beauty), if one is deluded by the sign of subha then it leads to wrong sati, wrong samādhi, wrong jhāna.
If the nimitta is asubha (non beauty) such as a corpse, 31 body parts, or the conceptual signs such as aging, impermanence of body, etc., it's a suitable samādhi nimitta for 4 jhānas.
you asked
Why does the type of person mentioned ("the person who doesn’t have a blemish but does not understand it"), focus on it?
It just means they still have the underlying defilement, but at times when the defilement is not manifested as a noticable blemish, they don't understand and realize the cause of the blemish, so when a suitable opportunity arises for the defilement to work on their mind, the blemish then appears.