Timeline for I explain why I prefer discuss Buddhism intellectually but others don't seem to accept my point. Why is that?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2019 at 8:35 | comment | added | ChrisW♦ | I tried posting there then. I don't know reddit's conventions, don't know whether what I posted is sectarian -- I hope it wasn't "disparaging". | |
| Feb 20, 2019 at 8:10 | comment | added | Ooker | yes, that's right | |
| Feb 20, 2019 at 7:37 | comment | added | ChrisW♦ | Are you saying you'd like me to repost this answer on r/Buddhism -- perhaps, because it answers that question ("Is Buddhism about...?")? And I think you're saying it "technically" doesn't answer this question (Why won't people accept...?"). | |
| Feb 19, 2019 at 23:15 | comment | added | Ooker | nope, it's not necessary that you can break down cognitive linguistics, it's just that you have provided much more relevant information to my idea. Again, this may be nitpicking, but I think this answer is better posted in there than here | |
| Feb 19, 2019 at 16:47 | comment | added | ChrisW♦ | I don't really know what cognitive linguistics are, nor anything much about Nagarjuna's Middle Way, so I can't comment on that, can't break that down. | |
| Feb 19, 2019 at 16:30 | comment | added | Ooker | A breakdown to my original post is what I'm actually looking for, but in this question technically it's off-topic. Should I accept it? I think it's better if you post this as a comment in that post. I agree that this may be a little nitpicking though | |
| Feb 18, 2019 at 16:54 | history | edited | ChrisW♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Feb 18, 2019 at 16:45 | history | answered | ChrisW♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |