Take the 2-minute tour ×
Buddhism Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people practicing or interested in Buddhist philosophy, teaching, and practice. It's 100% free, no registration required.

If I understand it correctly, Nirvana is the liberation from the endless cycle of rebirth, thereby terminating all sufferings.

Is Nirvana a goal which every Buddhist must achieve?

Is there any other things more important than attaining Nirvana?

share|improve this question
add comment

5 Answers 5

No, Nirvana is not the goal of all Buddhists. According to Sakya and Nyingma schools of Tibetan Buddhism, Buddhist liberation methodologies can be divided in three major classes, corresponding to sentient being's mental capacity:

  • students of lower capacity seek pleasant living conditions and personal happiness. For these beings the teaching focuses on fundamental principles such as karma, and posits the goal of better rebirth (and better luck in this life). When a being is born to conditions more favorable for deeper study and practice, or in the same life its interests raise beyond basic day-to-day existence, it is now considered as one of the
  • students of middling capacity, who seek spiritual realization. For them the teaching focuses on personal transformation through removal of mental and emotional obscurations and posits the goal of Nirvana. Once the student removed enough obscurations to have a glimpse of how things really are (tathata), he or she realizes that both Samsara as well as Nirvana are two sides of the same equation, and a projection of one's Thirst due to one's mind having been intoxicated with The Three Poisons. At this point they find themselves on the level of:
  • students of higher capacity, who practice Natural Great Perfection. For them the teaching focuses on manifesting unhindered compassionate action, union of wisdom and skillful means, and does not posit any goals.

The three capacities model should not be confused with the three yanas model (Hinayana/Mahayana/Vajrayana) which can be seen as three levels spanning the second and third capacities, nor with the three schools model (Theravada/Mahayana/Tibetan Buddhism) which are three alternative paths, with beings of all three capacities found in each school.

Another model defines goals according to one of the Six Worlds the being finds itself in:

  • For beings in Hell realm the goal is defined as Escape from Suffering
  • For beings in Animal realm the goal is defined as Wisdom
  • For beings in Preta realm the goal is defined as The Only Possession of Real Value
  • For beings in Human realm the goal is defined as Liberation
  • For beings in Asura realm the goal is defined as Perfection of Excellence
  • For beings in Heaven realm the goal is defined as Protection from Impermanence

There is also a nine-yanas model that provides a finer classification of enlightenment contexts, with a slightly different provisional goal utilized in each. Please note that all models exist solely for their explanatory value and are vastly simplifying reality, which is a lot less pigeonholed.

To answer your second question, is there any other thing more important than attaining Nirvana, this is like a school student asking, is there any other thing more important than finishing school. For the school student to finish the school is the most important thing. Nothing else can happen until then.

share|improve this answer
add comment

No. If your goal is to attain enlightenment you've gotten it all wrong and I would recommend Brad Warner's book, Hardcore Zen. It is much more important to act appropriately.

From the book:

I'd been doing zazen for for over a decade by then and was pretty miffed that I had yet to reach enlightenment...

Let me give you a little background. In a nutshell, there are two major schools of Zen in Japan: Soto, to which Nishijima belonged, and ... my teacher Tim McCarthy had studied and taught; and the Rinzai school... The difference between them is this: the Rinzai shcool believes in enlightenment and the Soto school does not.

He goes on to explain why simply having the goal of attaining enlightenment will pretty guarantee you will not reach Nirvana. Attaining enlightenment is a selfish goal. The selfish can not, by definition, attain enlightenment. It is a catch-22 type paradox.

If you don't buy that, then at least you should be aware that is a school that not only does not have a goal of attaining enlightenment, but they don't even believe in it.

share|improve this answer
    
Would you mind adding a little more context to this answer? –  Hrafn Jul 7 at 15:02
    
I agree, you could explain why exactly focusing on the goal can be counterproductive. –  Andrei Volkov Jul 7 at 15:13
1  
Awesome, thanks! ^_^ –  Hrafn Jul 7 at 15:22
1  
@kingkero Just like there are many different Christian sects, there are many different schools of Buddhism. Some practice zazen, some do not. Brad Warner is a priest of the Soto school. –  ckuhn203 Jul 7 at 17:50
2  
@kingkero hm that's an interesting perspective, I wonder how many people have no idea that Zen is a school of Buddhism, and as such works inside Buddhism's frame of reference as far as what and why albeit with a slightly different how. –  Andrei Volkov Jul 7 at 19:14
show 5 more comments

In the grand scheme of things, ending suffering and with it the endless cycle of rebirth is the ultimate goal of all forms of Buddhism.

However, while Theravada Buddhism focusses on personal enlightenment, other forms like Mahayana focus on the Bodhisattva ideal: Postponing enlightenment until all other lifeforms are free from suffering. In the Theravada tradition this Bodhisattva is postponing enlightenment until one can become a Buddha.

So to answer your questions:

  • yes, Nirvanna is a goal which every Buddhist strives to achieve.
  • In certain schools, enlightening others is more important (has more priority) than attaining Nirvana yourself.
share|improve this answer
    
One who becomes an Arahath can also help others to attain enlightenment. A Buddha also first attains enlightenment before teaching others. It's more like getting a degree vs getting a degree with honors. –  Sankha Kulathantille Jul 7 at 14:26
    
I hope that I wasn't implying that an Arahat could not, I was trying state that the order is different. First becoming enlightened and then help others vs. First help others, than become enlightened. –  DirkM Jul 7 at 22:23
    
But a Buddha also 1st becomes enlightened before helping others to become enlightened. So the order is the same. –  Sankha Kulathantille Jul 8 at 5:18
    
But a Bodhisattva in the Mahayana tradition doesn't, or at least not to the point that rebirth is ended. –  DirkM Jul 8 at 7:23
    
A Bodhisattva cultivating Paramitha to become a Buddha is not necessarily helping others to attain enlightenment on the way. He's perfecting his mind to attain Buddhahood. As far a I know, it's the same in the Mahayana tradition. The difference is they either want to become Buddhas themselves or become enlightened under a future Buddha. They just don't want to become enlightened in this Sasana. –  Sankha Kulathantille Jul 8 at 7:37
show 3 more comments

Many times, especially when responding to speculative questions, the Buddha announced that he teaches just two things — the universality of suffering and the path to the ending of suffering. That's what Buddhism is all about, no matter which of the many traditions. The Buddha taught the cause of suffering is clinging. This becomes a particular problem when one clings to the notion of a self or to a goal, such as the question implies.

One compounds the suffering if one announces to the world one is seeking the end of suffering. Thus the arising of the Mahayana, the first major division among the disciples of the Buddha. Mahayana pointed out the contradiction. They proposed an ideal of helping all others towards their ending of suffering, through compassion and generosity — the Bodhisattva ideal. Vajrayana derives from Mahayana and thus includes the Bodhisattva ideal.

Modern Theravada teachers frown on announcing whether one has become enlightened. Only those who had ended their concept of a self to be clung to, having achieved complete selflessness, would know whether the speaker had achieved complete selflessness. This takes the issue of Enlightenment off the table.

In the end all Buddhists seek the end of suffering. Some use the Bodhisattva vow to do it. Others seek it quietly. But all paths lead to the same end. At the end of the day, to be a Buddhist is to seek the ending of clinging.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Simple answer to your two questions

Is Nirvana a goal which every Buddhist must achieve? Yes. Ending the suffering is the ultimate goal of a true budhist

Is there any other things more important than attaining Nirvana? No

To answer this more, All budha's sutta and all teachings point to how to attain nibbana nothing else. In order to attain nibbana only thing you have to do is look into yourself and your sitha how thoughts come and go every second. Trick is not to attach to any of it because its impermanent. But if you get attached to these thoughts and feelings karma cycle begins in another words life begins at that moment.

Look at the Four stages of enlightenment and first step most important Sotapana.

The three fetters which the Sotāpanna eradicates are: (excerpted from Wikipedia for better explanation)

Self-view - The speculative view that a so-called self exists in the five aggregates (physical forms, feelings/sensations, perception, mental formations and consciousness) is eradicated because the Sotāpanna gains insight into the selfless nature of the aggregates.

Skeptical Doubt - Doubt about the Buddha, his teaching (Dhamma), and his community (Sangha) is eradicated because the Sotāpanna personally experiences the true nature of reality through insight, and this insight confirms the accuracy of the Buddha’s teaching.

Clinging to rites and rituals - Eradication of the view that one becomes pure simply through performing rituals (animal sacrifices, ablutions, chanting, etc.) or adhering to rigid moralism or relying on a god for non-causal delivery. Rites and rituals now function more to obscure, than to support the Right View of the Sotāpanna's now opened dharma eye.

The Sotāpanna realizes that deliverance can be won only through the practice of the Noble Eightfold Path.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.